HP Finanical Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

HP Finanical Analysis - Essay Example Hewlett Packard is the United States’ 8th largest corporation. The company s is within the top 20 corporations in the world (House, 2009). In 2013, the company was able to improve its global business operations. The 2013 accounting period generated an estimated $12 billion cash inflow. The year also reduced it net debt amount to the favorably lower zero debt amount. The company allocated and estimated $3 billion for research and development of new company products. The 2013 period included the giving of $ 2.6 billion dividends and capital returns to the company’s stockholders. Further, the HP leadership entered into new market segments to boost it global revenues and profits. The company’s 2013 operations included introducing new innovative products to the current and future global market segments. The segments include the Moonshot Server market, global data and security segment. Initially, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard created the garage-based company with $538 investment during 1938. Using United States as base, the company is one of the top manufacturers and sellers of personal computers. In the computing business, the company delivers the global customers’ needs, which includes data storage, personal computing, hardware networking, software creation, servers, scanners, digital cameras, notebooks, printers, and several related services (Pham, 2013). The three year financial report clearly shows the company performed financially better in 2013, compared to the prior 2012 year, as shown in Exhibit A in the appendix of this paper (Hewlett Packard, 2014). HP generated high earnings from operations during 2013, $7,752 million. This is definitely higher than the prior 2012 loss, -$10,181. Consequently, the company’s net earnings for 2013 is $9,149. This is higher than the prior 2012 year’s dismal $10,181 million net loss (Noreen, 2008). The three year financial analysis shows the company fared financially

The trade relations between China and the U.S Essay

The trade relations between China and the U.S - Essay Example (Morrison 4). Currently, China’s market for U.S products is estimated to be worth $300 billion judging from the exports from U.S to China and the total sales of U.S firms based in China (Morrison 8). As such, U.S-China trade ties have defied all the odds to remain strong with prospects of increase in trade despite the differences between the two trading partners. One aspect that makes trade between China and U.S interesting phenomena is the growing trade ties despite the complex relationships marked by major tensions. One of the major challenges that results in these tensions, in the trade is the difference in the market economies of the two countries, which though significant has been overlooked in the developing trade ties between the two countries. While U.S is a capitalist country that favors free economy policies, China has adamantly resisted the move to shift to a free economy market despite the growing pressure from the global markets (Morrison 26). As such, the country still imposes policies that lead to distortion of trade and investments. Some of the areas that have resulted in trade tensions include China’s poor policies in the management of intellectual property rights (Morrison 28). Others as Morrison explains are an increasing tendency where some Chinese firms are involved in cyber espionage against many U.S firms, a mov e that had threatened relations between the two countries. As such, the growing trade between the two countries has defied such tensions, which may suggest the two counties hold resources of strategic impotence in international trade, which overshadows the existing tensions. Government intervention in the Chinese market is another concept that affects the trade ties between the two countries, and impacts negatively on U.S. Some of the political factors include the reluctance of China to meet its obligations as set out by the World Trade Organization, use of market policies that force foreign firms to transfer technology